Both Pixelmator and Acorn are about $50 and, while they are probably competing more with the $80 Photoshop Elements, they do most of the tasks light users would want to buy the $200 PhotoshopCS5 for.
In my first comparison post Acorn got the edge mostly because their demo saved files with no watermark which meant one could actually use it before biting the bullet and spending $50.
Because of the various updates (i.e. heal tool) promised in Pixelmator 2 I bought Pixelmator 1.whatever and started using it as my go to editor.
As of January 2012 however, there is a weird bug that does not let me arbitrarily set the width and height pixels when cropping an image. Strangely both programs have a bug in this tool although they have different symptoms. My version of Acorn is behind since the Acorn 3 update is another $20 (I thought it was $50, but the author corrected me), so it may not have this issue, but I’m stuck using other programs to work around this bug which is annoying (we’ll see if it is $20 annoying soon).
I can’t speak to Acorn 3 vs Pixelmator 2, but in Acorn 2 vs Pixelmator 2, the latter wins handily.
Possibly Related posts:
- Acorn vs. Pixelmator (2008) Acorn and Pixelmator are two competing image editing applications. They...
- Acorn.app One of my top posts is Acorn vs. Pixelmator. Well,...
- I HATE … how Photoshop and all Adobe programs have cmd-cntrl-H as...
- Firefox Tool Tips So I have a folder of links called “blogs” and...
- Neo Office NeoOffice is a fully-featured set of office applications (including word...