Comments on: I need some photo archiving advice: http://dwightk.com/2009/12/i-need-some-photo-archiving-advice/ I'm serious, you pronounce it in Dwight Knoll Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:49:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc By: dwightk http://dwightk.com/2009/12/i-need-some-photo-archiving-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-71185 dwightk Sat, 26 Dec 2009 04:09:50 +0000 http://dwightk.com/?p=2295#comment-71185 Thanks. For now I'm just plugging along in iPhoto. After combining my two libraries it seems even slower at times. Maybe if I get way more Christmas money that I expect I'll give Aperture and Lightroom a try :D Thanks. For now I'm just plugging along in iPhoto. After combining my two libraries it seems even slower at times. Maybe if I get way more Christmas money that I expect I'll give Aperture and Lightroom a try :D

]]> By: Trey http://dwightk.com/2009/12/i-need-some-photo-archiving-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-71181 Trey Sat, 19 Dec 2009 03:40:02 +0000 http://dwightk.com/?p=2295#comment-71181 Hey Dwight...<br><br>I'm a pretty die-hard LR user... been with it since v1 was in Beta. But, as good of a program as it is, It has limitations & I've noticed that my catalogue (now at 100k images on two 1TB harddrives) is a little slow.<br><br>I like the RAW processing capabilities, however the noise reduction leaves a little to be desired compared to Aperture. I like the PS integration. I like the web & print functions.<br><br>I own both LR & Aperture, but only use Aperture for tethered capture on location. I don't know what it is exactly, but it seems like everything in LR is where I think it should be & called what I think it should be. It's very intuitive. Aperture is not as good in that area, in my opinion. But, I know plenty of people who use it exclusively and RAVE about it.<br><br>I'd say get the free trial of both (make sure to do the LR3 Beta) and see which fits you best. Hey Dwight…

I'm a pretty die-hard LR user… been with it since v1 was in Beta. But, as good of a program as it is, It has limitations & I've noticed that my catalogue (now at 100k images on two 1TB harddrives) is a little slow.

I like the RAW processing capabilities, however the noise reduction leaves a little to be desired compared to Aperture. I like the PS integration. I like the web & print functions.

I own both LR & Aperture, but only use Aperture for tethered capture on location. I don't know what it is exactly, but it seems like everything in LR is where I think it should be & called what I think it should be. It's very intuitive. Aperture is not as good in that area, in my opinion. But, I know plenty of people who use it exclusively and RAVE about it.

I'd say get the free trial of both (make sure to do the LR3 Beta) and see which fits you best.

]]>