<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: links for 2008-05-15</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dwightk.com/2008/05/links-for-2008-05-15/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dwightk.com/2008/05/links-for-2008-05-15/</link>
	<description>I'm serious, you pronounce it in Dwight Knoll</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:32:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dwight</title>
		<link>http://dwightk.com/2008/05/links-for-2008-05-15/comment-page-1/#comment-55812</link>
		<dc:creator>dwight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 13:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dwightk.com/2008/05/links-for-2008-05-15/#comment-55812</guid>
		<description>&quot;What has been is what will be, and what has been done is what will be done, and there is nothing new under the sun.&quot; (Ecclesiastes 1:9)  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What has been is what will be, and what has been done is what will be done, and there is nothing new under the sun.&#8221; (Ecclesiastes 1:9)  ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neener</title>
		<link>http://dwightk.com/2008/05/links-for-2008-05-15/comment-page-1/#comment-55798</link>
		<dc:creator>Neener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 20:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dwightk.com/2008/05/links-for-2008-05-15/#comment-55798</guid>
		<description>Good. I&#039;m glad it&#039;s not just me that thinks most news sites are just regurgitations from one original source. (I suppose this is similar to flipping through all the TV news shows at 6pm.) I&#039;ve also noticed on cnn.com that there are often new articles, but they just attach a few more sentences to old articles. I get all excited like Jojo the idiot circus boy about new news but am usually disappointed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good. I&#8217;m glad it&#8217;s not just me that thinks most news sites are just regurgitations from one original source. (I suppose this is similar to flipping through all the TV news shows at 6pm.) I&#8217;ve also noticed on cnn.com that there are often new articles, but they just attach a few more sentences to old articles. I get all excited like Jojo the idiot circus boy about new news but am usually disappointed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
